Deconstructing design thinking as a tool for the implementation of a population health initiative

Resumo

Background: The translation of evidence-based practices and rapid uptake of innovations into global health practice is challenging. Design thinking is a consultative process involving multiple stakeholders and has been identifed as a promising solution to create and apply implementation strategies in complex environments like health systems.
Methods: We conducted a process evaluation of a real-world example, namely an initiative to innovate hypertension screening, diagnosis and care in São Paulo, Brazil. The parameters of the evaluation were informed by a specifcation rubric and categorization system, recommended for the investigation of implementation strategies, and the doublediamond conceptual framework to escribe and examine the strategic architecture and nature of the design thinking approach, with particular emphasis on identifying potential areas of “value-add”particular to the approach. The retrospective evaluation was performed by an independent partner who had not been involved in the setting up and implementation of the design thinking process.
Results: The evaluation unveiled a dense catalogue of strategically driven, mostly theoretically based, activities involving all identifed health system stakeholders including patients. Narrative reconstruction illuminated the systematic and coherent nature of this approach, with diferent resulting actions progressively accounting for all relevant layers of the health system to engineer a broad selection of specifc implementation solutions. The relevance of the identifed features and the mechanics used to promote more successful implementation practices was manifested in several distinct ways: design thinking ofered a clear direction on which innovations really mattered and when, as well as several new dimensions for consideration in the development of an innovation mindset amongst stakeholders. It thereby promoted relationship quality in terms of familiarity and trust, and commitment to evidence-based enquiry and action. Design thinking was also able to navigate the territory between the need for intervention “fdelity” versus “adaptation” and provide the operational know-how to face familiar implementation hurdles. Lastly, it brought a new kind of skill set to the public health stakeholders that incorporated diplomacy, multidisciplinary approaches
and management sciences—skills that are considered necessary but not yet widely taught as part of public health training.
Conclusions: Design thinking is a sound and viable tool to use as part of an implementation strategy for engaging with health system stakeholders and successfully translating evidence-based practices and new innovations into routine practice, thereby addressing an important knowledge—practice gap and, more broadly, contributing to the strategic repertoire available to implementation science.